The debian-private mailing list leak, part 1. Volunteers have complained about Blackmail. Lynchings. Character assassination. Defamation. Cyberbullying. Volunteers who gave many years of their lives are picked out at random for cruel social experiments. The former DPL's girlfriend Molly de Blanc is given volunteers to experiment on for her crazy talks. These volunteers never consented to be used like lab rats. We don't either. debian-private can no longer be a safe space for the cabal. Let these monsters have nowhere to hide. Volunteers are not disposable. We stand with the victims.
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: new definition of non-free

On Thu, 24 Jul 1997 14:19:49 +0200 Christian Schwarz 
(schwarz@monet.m.isar.de) wrote:

> What about keeping contrib and non-free then, but change the policy for
> contrib? For example:
> 
>    - Packages in "contrib" have to apply to the DFSG as well. This
>      distribution is thought for packages that depend on 
>      non-free/non-us/contrib packages or which are "wrapper packages" for
>      other software products (either commercial or non-commercial).
> 
> Note, that this is a change in policy: All packages without source, for
> example, would have to be moved from contrib to non-free then. However, it
> will be clear then, that `non-free' means `not-dfsg-compliant'.

I second this.

Phil.
(in a me-tooist mood).



--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to
debian-private-request@lists.debian.org . 
Trouble?  e-mail to templin@bucknell.edu .