The debian-private mailing list leak, part 1. Volunteers have complained about Blackmail. Lynchings. Character assassination. Defamation. Cyberbullying. Volunteers who gave many years of their lives are picked out at random for cruel social experiments. The former DPL's girlfriend Molly de Blanc is given volunteers to experiment on for her crazy talks. These volunteers never consented to be used like lab rats. We don't either. debian-private can no longer be a safe space for the cabal. Let these monsters have nowhere to hide. Volunteers are not disposable. We stand with the victims.
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: THOUGHT: New 'user-contributed' section?

> 
> The following is not a proposal, however I'd appreciate to know what
> people think about this: 

> So, what do you think?
> 	[X] Interesting... Needs more discution.

Well, who is going to maintain the packages. It may well be that
today the package looks quite OK and "we" (whoever that may be) decides
we like the package. But bugs will probably be found, and should be 
fixed. Should we allow for "floating maintainers" who just fix bugs
for various "new-contrib" packages, or, if they don't feel like fixing
them, the packages loose their "stamp of approval"?

So in general:
  - who decides the packages are OK in the first place?
  - Who fixes bugs?


-- 
joost witteveen, joostje@debian.org
#!/bin/perl -sp0777i<X+d*lMLa^*lN%0]dsXx++lMlN/dsM0<j]dsj
$/=unpack('H*',$_);$_=`echo 16dio\U$k"SK$/SM$n\EsN0p[lN*1
lK[d2%Sa2/d0$^Ixp"|dc`;s/\W//g;$_=pack('H*',/((..)*)$/)